Javadrashid R et al: Visibility of different intraorbital foreign bodies using plain radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Can Assoc Radiol J. 68(2):194-201, 2017
Momoniat HT et al: An investigation into the accuracy of orbital X-rays, when using CR, in detecting ferromagnetic intraocular foreign bodies. Radiography (Lond). 23(1):55-59, 2017
Nguyen VD et al: Demystifying orbital emergencies: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 37(3):947-962, 2017
Allon G et al: The role of computed tomography in the immediate workup of open globe injury. Eur J Ophthalmol. 26(5):503-4, 2016
Modjtahedi BS et al: Imaging characteristics of intraocular foreign bodies: a comparative study of plain film X-ray, computed tomography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. Retina. 35(1):95-104, 2015
Winegar BA et al: Imaging of orbital trauma and emergent non-traumatic conditions. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 25(3):439-56, 2015
Pinto A et al: Role of computed tomography in the assessment of intraorbital foreign bodies. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 33(5):392-5, 2012
Nishio Y et al: A case of delayed brain abscess due to a retained intracranial wooden foreign body: a case report and review of the last 20 years. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 146(8):847-50, 2004
Fulcher TP et al: Clinical features and management of intraorbital foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 109(3):494-500, 2002
Murphy KJ et al: Orbital plain films as a prerequisite for MR imaging: is a known history of injury a sufficient screening criterion? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 167(4):1053-5, 1996
Related Anatomy
Loading...
Related Differential Diagnoses
Loading...
References
Tables
Tables
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
Selected References
Javadrashid R et al: Visibility of different intraorbital foreign bodies using plain radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Can Assoc Radiol J. 68(2):194-201, 2017
Momoniat HT et al: An investigation into the accuracy of orbital X-rays, when using CR, in detecting ferromagnetic intraocular foreign bodies. Radiography (Lond). 23(1):55-59, 2017
Nguyen VD et al: Demystifying orbital emergencies: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 37(3):947-962, 2017
Allon G et al: The role of computed tomography in the immediate workup of open globe injury. Eur J Ophthalmol. 26(5):503-4, 2016
Modjtahedi BS et al: Imaging characteristics of intraocular foreign bodies: a comparative study of plain film X-ray, computed tomography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. Retina. 35(1):95-104, 2015
Winegar BA et al: Imaging of orbital trauma and emergent non-traumatic conditions. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 25(3):439-56, 2015
Pinto A et al: Role of computed tomography in the assessment of intraorbital foreign bodies. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 33(5):392-5, 2012
Nishio Y et al: A case of delayed brain abscess due to a retained intracranial wooden foreign body: a case report and review of the last 20 years. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 146(8):847-50, 2004
Fulcher TP et al: Clinical features and management of intraorbital foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 109(3):494-500, 2002
Murphy KJ et al: Orbital plain films as a prerequisite for MR imaging: is a known history of injury a sufficient screening criterion? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 167(4):1053-5, 1996
Essential Information
STATdx includes over 200,000 searchable images, including x-ray, CT, MR, and ultrasound images. To access all images, please log in or subscribe.