Yu P et al: Correlation between 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and BI-RADS assessment using ultrasound in the evaluation of breast lesions: A Multicenter Study. Acad Radiol. ePub, 2019
Palot Manzil FF et al: 18F-FDG PET/CT unveiling of implant rupture and clinically unsuspected silicone granuloma in treated breast cancer. J Nucl Med Technol. 46(4):394-5, 2018
Tayyab SJ et al: A pictorial review: multimodality imaging of benign and suspicious features of fat necrosis in the breast. Br J Radiol. 20180213, 2018
Verma P et al: Increased F-FDG uptake in bilateral gynecomastia secondary to feminizing adrenal tumor: A rare case report and review of literature. Indian J Nucl Med. 32(2):145-7, 2017
Dong A et al: Spectrum of the breast lesions with increased 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 41(7):543-57, 2016
Choi EK et al: Herpes zoster mimicking breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis on PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 40(7):572-3, 2015
Adejolu M et al: False-positive lesions mimicking breast cancer on FDG PET and PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198(3):W304-14, 2012
Lakhani P et al: Correlation between quantified breast densities from digital mammography and 18F-FDG PET uptake. Breast J. 15(4):339-47, 2009
Lim HS et al: FDG PET/CT for the detection and evaluation of breast diseases: usefulness and limitations. Radiographics. 27 Suppl 1:S197-213, 2007
Metser U et al: Benign nonphysiologic lesions with increased 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT: characterization and incidence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 189(5):1203-10, 2007
Berg WA et al: High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression ("positron emission mammography") is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer. Breast J. 12(4):309-23, 2006
Kumar R et al: Clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative FDG-PET in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 98(3):267-74, 2006
Abouzied MM et al: 18F-FDG imaging: pitfalls and artifacts. J Nucl Med Technol. 33(3):145-55; quiz 162-3, 2005
Rosen EL et al: Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience. Radiology. 234(2):527-34, 2005
Hurwitz R: F-18 FDG positron emission tomographic imaging in a case of ruptured breast implant: inflammation or recurrent tumor? Clin Nucl Med. 28(9):755-6, 2003
Vranjesevic D et al: Relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and breast density in women with normal breast tissue. J Nucl Med. 44(8):1238-42, 2003
Avril N et al: Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. J Clin Oncol. 18(20):3495-502, 2000
Bakheet SM et al: F-18 FDG uptake in breast infection and inflammation. Clin Nucl Med. 25(2):100-3, 2000
Related Anatomy
Loading...
Related Differential Diagnoses
Loading...
References
Tables
Tables
KEY FACTS
Terminology
Imaging
Top Differential Diagnoses
Clinical Issues
Diagnostic Checklist
Scanning Tips
IMAGING
General Features
Nuclear Medicine Findings
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
CLINICAL ISSUES
Presentation
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Image Interpretation Pearls
Selected References
Yu P et al: Correlation between 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and BI-RADS assessment using ultrasound in the evaluation of breast lesions: A Multicenter Study. Acad Radiol. ePub, 2019
Palot Manzil FF et al: 18F-FDG PET/CT unveiling of implant rupture and clinically unsuspected silicone granuloma in treated breast cancer. J Nucl Med Technol. 46(4):394-5, 2018
Tayyab SJ et al: A pictorial review: multimodality imaging of benign and suspicious features of fat necrosis in the breast. Br J Radiol. 20180213, 2018
Verma P et al: Increased F-FDG uptake in bilateral gynecomastia secondary to feminizing adrenal tumor: A rare case report and review of literature. Indian J Nucl Med. 32(2):145-7, 2017
Dong A et al: Spectrum of the breast lesions with increased 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 41(7):543-57, 2016
Choi EK et al: Herpes zoster mimicking breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis on PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 40(7):572-3, 2015
Adejolu M et al: False-positive lesions mimicking breast cancer on FDG PET and PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198(3):W304-14, 2012
Lakhani P et al: Correlation between quantified breast densities from digital mammography and 18F-FDG PET uptake. Breast J. 15(4):339-47, 2009
Lim HS et al: FDG PET/CT for the detection and evaluation of breast diseases: usefulness and limitations. Radiographics. 27 Suppl 1:S197-213, 2007
Metser U et al: Benign nonphysiologic lesions with increased 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT: characterization and incidence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 189(5):1203-10, 2007
Berg WA et al: High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression ("positron emission mammography") is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer. Breast J. 12(4):309-23, 2006
Kumar R et al: Clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative FDG-PET in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 98(3):267-74, 2006
Abouzied MM et al: 18F-FDG imaging: pitfalls and artifacts. J Nucl Med Technol. 33(3):145-55; quiz 162-3, 2005
Rosen EL et al: Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience. Radiology. 234(2):527-34, 2005
Hurwitz R: F-18 FDG positron emission tomographic imaging in a case of ruptured breast implant: inflammation or recurrent tumor? Clin Nucl Med. 28(9):755-6, 2003
Vranjesevic D et al: Relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and breast density in women with normal breast tissue. J Nucl Med. 44(8):1238-42, 2003
Avril N et al: Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. J Clin Oncol. 18(20):3495-502, 2000
Bakheet SM et al: F-18 FDG uptake in breast infection and inflammation. Clin Nucl Med. 25(2):100-3, 2000
STATdx includes over 200,000 searchable images, including x-ray, CT, MR, and ultrasound images. To access all images, please log in or subscribe.