Echogenic foci visible on US, typically corresponding to calcifications (Ca⁺⁺) on mammography
Macrocalcifications: Coarse echogenic Ca⁺⁺ (usually ≥ 0.5 mm in diameter) attenuate US beam and cause posterior shadowing
Microcalcifications in or outside mass: Too small to cause shadowing
Echogenic foci are more conspicuous within mass or duct than within echogenic fibroglandular tissue
Threshold for US detection of microcalcifications using 12- to 18-MHz linear transducer is ~ 110 μm (> 0.1 mm)
Typically may visualize microcalcifications 0.2-0.5 mm
Dependent on depth, speckle, surrounding tissue
Distinguish from acoustic speckle, Cooper ligaments, collagen fibers on end, pectoral muscle fascicles
IMAGING
Mammographic Findings
Ultrasonographic Findings
Imaging Recommendations
Image-Guided Biopsy
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
PATHOLOGY
General Features
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Consider
Image Interpretation Pearls
Selected References
Machado P et al: Ultrasound detection of microcalcifications in surgical breast specimens. Ultrasound Med Biol. 44(6):1286-90, 2018
Relea A et al: Usefulness of the twinkling artifact on Doppler ultrasound for the detection of breast microcalcifications. Radiologia. 60(5):413-23, 2018
Choi JJ et al: Detectability and usefulness of automated whole breast ultrasound in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: comparison with handheld breast ultrasound. J Breast Cancer. 19(4):429-37, 2016
Keränen AK et al: Ultrasonography as a guiding method in breast micro-calcification vacuum-assisted biopsies. Ultraschall Med. 37(5):497-502, 2016
Bae S et al: Breast microcalcifications: diagnostic outcomes according to image-guided biopsy method. Korean J Radiol. 16(5):996-1005, 2015
Yao JJ et al: Sonographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with microinvasion: correlation with clinicopathologic findings and biomarkers. J Ultrasound Med. 34(10):1761-8, 2015
Akaike G et al: Ultrasonography mapping combined with mammography before breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer with microcalcifications: a novel approach. Clin Breast Cancer. 14(5):352-7, 2014
Grigoryev M et al: Detection of microcalcifications in women with dense breasts and hypoechoic focal lesions: comparison of mammography and ultrasound. Ultraschall Med. 35(6):554-60, 2014
Chang RF et al: Automatic detection of microcalcifications in breast ultrasound. Med Phys. 40(10):102901, 2013
Berg WA et al: Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 262(2):435-49, 2012
Evans A et al: Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology. 263(3):673-7, 2012
Stöblen F et al: High-frequency breast ultrasound for the detection of microcalcifications and associated masses in BI-RADS 4a patients. Anticancer Res. 31(8):2575-81, 2011
Cho N et al: Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Eur Radiol. 19(7):1621-8, 2009
Cho N et al: Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography. Acta Radiol. 50(6):602-9, 2009
Feldman MK et al: US artifacts. Radiographics. 29(4):1179-89, 2009
Okazaki H et al: Radiologic-pathological correlation of punctate hyperechoic foci by ultrasound in stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy samples. Jpn J Radiol. 27(10):438-43, 2009
Nagashima T et al: Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer. 12(3):216-20, 2005
Yang WT et al: Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 182(1):101-10, 2004
Chen SC et al: Sonographic differentiation of invasive and intraductal carcinomas of the breast. Br J Radiol. 76(909):600-4, 2003
Soo MS et al: Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 180(4):941-8, 2003
Cheung YC et al: Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound. 30(6):323-31, 2002
Hashimoto BE et al: High detection rate of breast ductal carcinoma in situ calcifications on mammographically directed high-resolution sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 20(5):501-8, 2001
Moon WK et al: US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology. 217(3):849-54, 2000
Teh WL et al: Ultrasound guided core biopsy of suspicious mammographic calcifications using high frequency and power Doppler ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 55(5):390-4, 2000
Related Anatomy
Loading...
Related Differential Diagnoses
Loading...
References
Tables
Tables
KEY FACTS
Terminology
Imaging
Top Differential Diagnoses
Diagnostic Checklist
TERMINOLOGY
Definitions
Echogenic foci visible on US, typically corresponding to calcifications (Ca⁺⁺) on mammography
Macrocalcifications: Coarse echogenic Ca⁺⁺ (usually ≥ 0.5 mm in diameter) attenuate US beam and cause posterior shadowing
Microcalcifications in or outside mass: Too small to cause shadowing
Echogenic foci are more conspicuous within mass or duct than within echogenic fibroglandular tissue
Threshold for US detection of microcalcifications using 12- to 18-MHz linear transducer is ~ 110 μm (> 0.1 mm)
Typically may visualize microcalcifications 0.2-0.5 mm
Dependent on depth, speckle, surrounding tissue
Distinguish from acoustic speckle, Cooper ligaments, collagen fibers on end, pectoral muscle fascicles
IMAGING
Mammographic Findings
Ultrasonographic Findings
Imaging Recommendations
Image-Guided Biopsy
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
PATHOLOGY
General Features
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Consider
Image Interpretation Pearls
Selected References
Machado P et al: Ultrasound detection of microcalcifications in surgical breast specimens. Ultrasound Med Biol. 44(6):1286-90, 2018
Relea A et al: Usefulness of the twinkling artifact on Doppler ultrasound for the detection of breast microcalcifications. Radiologia. 60(5):413-23, 2018
Choi JJ et al: Detectability and usefulness of automated whole breast ultrasound in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: comparison with handheld breast ultrasound. J Breast Cancer. 19(4):429-37, 2016
Keränen AK et al: Ultrasonography as a guiding method in breast micro-calcification vacuum-assisted biopsies. Ultraschall Med. 37(5):497-502, 2016
Bae S et al: Breast microcalcifications: diagnostic outcomes according to image-guided biopsy method. Korean J Radiol. 16(5):996-1005, 2015
Yao JJ et al: Sonographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with microinvasion: correlation with clinicopathologic findings and biomarkers. J Ultrasound Med. 34(10):1761-8, 2015
Akaike G et al: Ultrasonography mapping combined with mammography before breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer with microcalcifications: a novel approach. Clin Breast Cancer. 14(5):352-7, 2014
Grigoryev M et al: Detection of microcalcifications in women with dense breasts and hypoechoic focal lesions: comparison of mammography and ultrasound. Ultraschall Med. 35(6):554-60, 2014
Chang RF et al: Automatic detection of microcalcifications in breast ultrasound. Med Phys. 40(10):102901, 2013
Berg WA et al: Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 262(2):435-49, 2012
Evans A et al: Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology. 263(3):673-7, 2012
Stöblen F et al: High-frequency breast ultrasound for the detection of microcalcifications and associated masses in BI-RADS 4a patients. Anticancer Res. 31(8):2575-81, 2011
Cho N et al: Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Eur Radiol. 19(7):1621-8, 2009
Cho N et al: Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography. Acta Radiol. 50(6):602-9, 2009
Feldman MK et al: US artifacts. Radiographics. 29(4):1179-89, 2009
Okazaki H et al: Radiologic-pathological correlation of punctate hyperechoic foci by ultrasound in stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy samples. Jpn J Radiol. 27(10):438-43, 2009
Nagashima T et al: Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer. 12(3):216-20, 2005
Yang WT et al: Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 182(1):101-10, 2004
Chen SC et al: Sonographic differentiation of invasive and intraductal carcinomas of the breast. Br J Radiol. 76(909):600-4, 2003
Soo MS et al: Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 180(4):941-8, 2003
Cheung YC et al: Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound. 30(6):323-31, 2002
Hashimoto BE et al: High detection rate of breast ductal carcinoma in situ calcifications on mammographically directed high-resolution sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 20(5):501-8, 2001
Moon WK et al: US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology. 217(3):849-54, 2000
Teh WL et al: Ultrasound guided core biopsy of suspicious mammographic calcifications using high frequency and power Doppler ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 55(5):390-4, 2000
STATdx includes over 200,000 searchable images, including x-ray, CT, MR, and ultrasound images. To access all images, please log in or subscribe.