link
Bookmarks
Cervical Cancer
Brad Perry, MD; Paige Bennett, MD
To access 4,300 diagnoses written by the world's leading experts in radiology, please log in or subscribe.Log inSubscribe
1
9
2
3

KEY FACTS

  • Imaging

    • Pathology

      • Clinical Issues

        • Diagnostic Checklist

          IMAGING

          • F-18 FDG PET/CT Findings

            • Research PET Radiotracers

              • MR Findings

                • General Features

                  • Artifacts and Quality Control

                    DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

                      PATHOLOGY

                      • General Features

                        • Staging, Grading, & Classification

                          CLINICAL ISSUES

                          • Presentation

                            • Demographics

                              • Natural History & Prognosis

                                • Treatment

                                  DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST

                                  • Consider

                                    • Image Interpretation Pearls

                                      Selected References

                                      1. Kusmirek J et al: PET/CT and MRI in the imaging assessment of cervical cancer. Abdom Imaging. 40(7): 2486-571, 2015
                                      2. Delbke D et al: Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0*. Society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging: practice guidelines. http://snmmi.files.cms-plus.com/docs/jnm30551_online.pdf. Approved February 11, 2006. Accessed August 26, 2014
                                      3. Herrera FG et al: The role of PET/CT in cervical cancer. Front Oncol. 3:34, 2013
                                      4. Leblanc E et al: Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 18(8):2302-9, 2011
                                      5. Showalter TN et al: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and pathologic tumor size in early-stage invasive cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 19(8):1412-4, 2009
                                      6. Amit A et al: The role of hybrid PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 100(1):65-9, 2006
                                      7. Chou HH et al: Low value of [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in primary staging of early-stage cervical cancer before radical hysterectomy. J Clin Oncol. 24(1):123-8, 2006
                                      8. Chung HH et al: Clinical impact of FDG-PET imaging in post-therapy surveillance of uterine cervical cancer: from diagnosis to prognosis. Gynecol Oncol. 103(1):165-70, 2006
                                      9. Chung HH et al: Clinical impact of integrated PET/CT on the management of suspected cervical cancer recurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 2006
                                      10. Lin CT et al: Role of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in re-recurrent cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 16(6):1994-2003, 2006
                                      11. Sironi S et al: Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology. 238(1):272-9, 2006
                                      12. Grosu AL et al: Positron emission tomography for radiation treatment planning. Strahlenther Onkol. 181(8):483-99, 2005
                                      13. Havrilesky LJ et al: FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 97(1):183-91, 2005
                                      14. Park W et al: The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 35(5):260-4, 2005
                                      15. Roh JW et al: Role of positron emission tomography in pretreatment lymph node staging of uterine cervical cancer: a prospective surgicopathologic correlation study. Eur J Cancer. 41(14):2086-92, 2005
                                      Related Anatomy
                                      Loading...
                                      Related Differential Diagnoses
                                      Loading...
                                      References
                                      Tables

                                      Tables

                                      KEY FACTS

                                      • Imaging

                                        • Pathology

                                          • Clinical Issues

                                            • Diagnostic Checklist

                                              IMAGING

                                              • F-18 FDG PET/CT Findings

                                                • Research PET Radiotracers

                                                  • MR Findings

                                                    • General Features

                                                      • Artifacts and Quality Control

                                                        DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

                                                          PATHOLOGY

                                                          • General Features

                                                            • Staging, Grading, & Classification

                                                              CLINICAL ISSUES

                                                              • Presentation

                                                                • Demographics

                                                                  • Natural History & Prognosis

                                                                    • Treatment

                                                                      DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST

                                                                      • Consider

                                                                        • Image Interpretation Pearls

                                                                          Selected References

                                                                          1. Kusmirek J et al: PET/CT and MRI in the imaging assessment of cervical cancer. Abdom Imaging. 40(7): 2486-571, 2015
                                                                          2. Delbke D et al: Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0*. Society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging: practice guidelines. http://snmmi.files.cms-plus.com/docs/jnm30551_online.pdf. Approved February 11, 2006. Accessed August 26, 2014
                                                                          3. Herrera FG et al: The role of PET/CT in cervical cancer. Front Oncol. 3:34, 2013
                                                                          4. Leblanc E et al: Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 18(8):2302-9, 2011
                                                                          5. Showalter TN et al: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and pathologic tumor size in early-stage invasive cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 19(8):1412-4, 2009
                                                                          6. Amit A et al: The role of hybrid PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 100(1):65-9, 2006
                                                                          7. Chou HH et al: Low value of [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in primary staging of early-stage cervical cancer before radical hysterectomy. J Clin Oncol. 24(1):123-8, 2006
                                                                          8. Chung HH et al: Clinical impact of FDG-PET imaging in post-therapy surveillance of uterine cervical cancer: from diagnosis to prognosis. Gynecol Oncol. 103(1):165-70, 2006
                                                                          9. Chung HH et al: Clinical impact of integrated PET/CT on the management of suspected cervical cancer recurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 2006
                                                                          10. Lin CT et al: Role of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in re-recurrent cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 16(6):1994-2003, 2006
                                                                          11. Sironi S et al: Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology. 238(1):272-9, 2006
                                                                          12. Grosu AL et al: Positron emission tomography for radiation treatment planning. Strahlenther Onkol. 181(8):483-99, 2005
                                                                          13. Havrilesky LJ et al: FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 97(1):183-91, 2005
                                                                          14. Park W et al: The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 35(5):260-4, 2005
                                                                          15. Roh JW et al: Role of positron emission tomography in pretreatment lymph node staging of uterine cervical cancer: a prospective surgicopathologic correlation study. Eur J Cancer. 41(14):2086-92, 2005