Performed in early-stage CxCA (up to stage 1B), preserves fertility
IMAGING
General Features
Ultrasonographic Findings
CT Findings
MR Findings
Nuclear Medicine Findings
Imaging Recommendations
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
PATHOLOGY
General Features
Staging, Grading, & Classification
Gross Pathologic & Surgical Features
Microscopic Features
Prognostic factors
CLINICAL ISSUES
Presentation
Demographics
Natural History & Prognosis
Treatment
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Consider
Image Interpretation Pearls
Selected References
Goldberg Y et al: The added benefit of transvaginal sonography in the clinical staging of cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 99(3):312-6, 2020
Mansoori B et al: Multimodality imaging of uterine cervical malignancies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 215(2):292-304, 2020
Salib MY et al: 2018 FIGO staging classification for cervical cancer: added benefits of imaging. Radiographics. 40(6):1807-22, 2020
Haldorsen IS et al: What is the role of imaging at primary diagnostic work-up in uterine cervical cancer? Curr Oncol Rep. 21(9):77, 2019
Lee SI et al: 2018 FIGO staging system for uterine cervical cancer: enter cross-sectional imaging. Radiology. 292(1):15-24, 2019
Dutta S et al: Image-guided radiotherapy and -brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Front Oncol. 5:64, 2015
Koh WJ et al: Cervical cancer, Version 2. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 13(4):395-404, 2015
Kusmirek J et al: PET/CT and MRI in the imaging assessment of cervical cancer. Abdom Imaging. 40(7):2486-511, 2015
Epstein E et al: Early-stage cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound - a European multicenter trial. Gynecol Oncol. 128(3):449-53, 2013
Thomeer MG et al: Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 23(7):2005-18, 2013
Mahantshetty U et al: Trans-abdominal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlation for conformal intracavitary brachytherapy in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Radiother Oncol. 102(1):130-4, 2012
Park SB et al: Sonographic findings of uterine cervical lymphoma manifesting as multinodular lesions. Clin Imaging. 36(5):636-8, 2012
Sahdev A: Cervical tumors. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 31(5):399-413, 2010
Testa AC et al: Transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of presence, size and extent of invasive cervical cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 34(3):335-44, 2009
Related Anatomy
Loading...
Related Differential Diagnoses
Loading...
References
Tables
Tables
KEY FACTS
Imaging
Top Differential Diagnoses
Pathology
Clinical Issues
Diagnostic Checklist
TERMINOLOGY
Definitions
Pap smear: Papanicolaou test; cervical cytology to screen for cervical neoplasia
Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)
Allows outpatient biopsy of abnormal areas detected at colposcopy
Cone biopsy: Removal of cone of tissue, including transformation zone
Used for diagnosis (abnormal Pap smear) and therapy [cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) stage 2, 3]
Performed in early-stage CxCA (up to stage 1B), preserves fertility
IMAGING
General Features
Ultrasonographic Findings
CT Findings
MR Findings
Nuclear Medicine Findings
Imaging Recommendations
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
PATHOLOGY
General Features
Staging, Grading, & Classification
Gross Pathologic & Surgical Features
Microscopic Features
Prognostic factors
CLINICAL ISSUES
Presentation
Demographics
Natural History & Prognosis
Treatment
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Consider
Image Interpretation Pearls
Selected References
Goldberg Y et al: The added benefit of transvaginal sonography in the clinical staging of cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 99(3):312-6, 2020
Mansoori B et al: Multimodality imaging of uterine cervical malignancies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 215(2):292-304, 2020
Salib MY et al: 2018 FIGO staging classification for cervical cancer: added benefits of imaging. Radiographics. 40(6):1807-22, 2020
Haldorsen IS et al: What is the role of imaging at primary diagnostic work-up in uterine cervical cancer? Curr Oncol Rep. 21(9):77, 2019
Lee SI et al: 2018 FIGO staging system for uterine cervical cancer: enter cross-sectional imaging. Radiology. 292(1):15-24, 2019
Dutta S et al: Image-guided radiotherapy and -brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Front Oncol. 5:64, 2015
Koh WJ et al: Cervical cancer, Version 2. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 13(4):395-404, 2015
Kusmirek J et al: PET/CT and MRI in the imaging assessment of cervical cancer. Abdom Imaging. 40(7):2486-511, 2015
Epstein E et al: Early-stage cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound - a European multicenter trial. Gynecol Oncol. 128(3):449-53, 2013
Thomeer MG et al: Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 23(7):2005-18, 2013
Mahantshetty U et al: Trans-abdominal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlation for conformal intracavitary brachytherapy in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Radiother Oncol. 102(1):130-4, 2012
Park SB et al: Sonographic findings of uterine cervical lymphoma manifesting as multinodular lesions. Clin Imaging. 36(5):636-8, 2012
Sahdev A: Cervical tumors. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 31(5):399-413, 2010
Testa AC et al: Transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of presence, size and extent of invasive cervical cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 34(3):335-44, 2009
STATdx includes over 200,000 searchable images, including x-ray, CT, MR, and ultrasound images. To access all images, please log in or subscribe.