Spinal canal and neural foraminal narrowing in cervical spine secondary to multifactorial degenerative changes
IMAGING
General Features
Radiographic Findings
CT Findings
MR Findings
Nonvascular Interventions
Imaging Recommendations
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
PATHOLOGY
General Features
Staging, Grading, & Classification
Gross Pathologic & Surgical Features
Microscopic Features
CLINICAL ISSUES
Presentation
Demographics
Natural History & Prognosis
Treatment
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Consider
Image Interpretation Pearls
Selected References
Nouri A et al: Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a brief review of past perspectives, present developments, and future directions. J Clin Med. 9(2), 2020
Karadimas SK et al: Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 38(22 Suppl 1):S21-36, 2013
Toledano M et al: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurol Clin. 31(1):287-305, 2013
Fehlings MG et al: Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study. J Neurosurg Spine. 16(5):425-32, 2012
Harrop JS et al: Cervical myelopathy: a clinical and radiographic evaluation and correlation to cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 35(6):620-4, 2010
Baron EM et al: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a brief review of its pathophysiology, clinical course, and diagnosis. Neurosurgery. 60(1 Supp1 1):S35-41, 2007
Medow JE et al: Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for surgical corpectomy. Spine J. 6(6 Suppl):233S-41S, 2006
Rao RD et al: Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88(7):1619-40, 2006
Edwards CC 2nd et al: Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine. 27(11): 1168-75, 2002
Epstein N: Posterior approaches in the management of cervical spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Surg Neurol. 58(3-4): 194-207; discussion 207-8, 2002
Geck MJ et al: Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am. 33(2): 329-48, 2002
Handa Y et al: Evaluation of prognostic factors and clinical outcome in elderly patients in whom expansive laminoplasty is performed for cervical myelopathy due to multisegmental spondylotic canal stenosis. A retrospective comparison with younger patients. J Neurosurg. 96(2 Suppl): 173-9, 2002
Mayr MT et al: Cervical spinal stenosis: outcome after anterior corpectomy, allograft reconstruction, and instrumentation. J Neurosurg. 96(1 Suppl): 10-6, 2002
Tani S et al: Laminoplasty with preservation of posterior cervical elements: surgical technique. Neurosurgery. 50(1): 97-101; discussion 101-2, 2002
Emery SE: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 9(6): 376-88, 2001
Fouyas IP et al: Surgery for cervical radiculomyelopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (3): CD001466, 2001
Satomi K et al: Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine J. 1(1): 26-30, 2001
Yue WM et al: The Torg--Pavlov ratio in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparative study between patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a nonspondylotic, nonmyelopathic population. Spine. 26(16): 1760-4, 2001
Kawakami M et al: A comparative study of surgical approaches for cervical compressive myelopathy. Clin Orthop. (381): 129-36, 2000
Alfieri KM et al: MR imaging of spinal stenosis. Applied Radiology. August:18-26, 1997
Amundsen T et al: Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine. 20(10):1178-86, 1995
Modic MT et al: Imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (239):109-20, 1989
Spinal canal and neural foraminal narrowing in cervical spine secondary to multifactorial degenerative changes
IMAGING
General Features
Radiographic Findings
CT Findings
MR Findings
Nonvascular Interventions
Imaging Recommendations
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
PATHOLOGY
General Features
Staging, Grading, & Classification
Gross Pathologic & Surgical Features
Microscopic Features
CLINICAL ISSUES
Presentation
Demographics
Natural History & Prognosis
Treatment
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Consider
Image Interpretation Pearls
Selected References
Nouri A et al: Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a brief review of past perspectives, present developments, and future directions. J Clin Med. 9(2), 2020
Karadimas SK et al: Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 38(22 Suppl 1):S21-36, 2013
Toledano M et al: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurol Clin. 31(1):287-305, 2013
Fehlings MG et al: Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study. J Neurosurg Spine. 16(5):425-32, 2012
Harrop JS et al: Cervical myelopathy: a clinical and radiographic evaluation and correlation to cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 35(6):620-4, 2010
Baron EM et al: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a brief review of its pathophysiology, clinical course, and diagnosis. Neurosurgery. 60(1 Supp1 1):S35-41, 2007
Medow JE et al: Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for surgical corpectomy. Spine J. 6(6 Suppl):233S-41S, 2006
Rao RD et al: Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88(7):1619-40, 2006
Edwards CC 2nd et al: Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine. 27(11): 1168-75, 2002
Epstein N: Posterior approaches in the management of cervical spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Surg Neurol. 58(3-4): 194-207; discussion 207-8, 2002
Geck MJ et al: Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am. 33(2): 329-48, 2002
Handa Y et al: Evaluation of prognostic factors and clinical outcome in elderly patients in whom expansive laminoplasty is performed for cervical myelopathy due to multisegmental spondylotic canal stenosis. A retrospective comparison with younger patients. J Neurosurg. 96(2 Suppl): 173-9, 2002
Mayr MT et al: Cervical spinal stenosis: outcome after anterior corpectomy, allograft reconstruction, and instrumentation. J Neurosurg. 96(1 Suppl): 10-6, 2002
Tani S et al: Laminoplasty with preservation of posterior cervical elements: surgical technique. Neurosurgery. 50(1): 97-101; discussion 101-2, 2002
Emery SE: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 9(6): 376-88, 2001
Fouyas IP et al: Surgery for cervical radiculomyelopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (3): CD001466, 2001
Satomi K et al: Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine J. 1(1): 26-30, 2001
Yue WM et al: The Torg--Pavlov ratio in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparative study between patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a nonspondylotic, nonmyelopathic population. Spine. 26(16): 1760-4, 2001
Kawakami M et al: A comparative study of surgical approaches for cervical compressive myelopathy. Clin Orthop. (381): 129-36, 2000
Alfieri KM et al: MR imaging of spinal stenosis. Applied Radiology. August:18-26, 1997
Amundsen T et al: Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine. 20(10):1178-86, 1995
Modic MT et al: Imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (239):109-20, 1989
STATdx includes over 200,000 searchable images, including x-ray, CT, MR, and ultrasound images. To access all images, please log in or subscribe.