link
Bookmarks
 (0)
Ultrasound
Diagnosis
Urinary Tract
Prostate
CEUS Prostate: Malignant Lesions
CEUS Prostate: Malignant Lesions
Richard G. Barr, MD, PhD, FACR, FAIUM, FSRU; Simona Turco, PhD, MSc; Hessel Wijkstra, PhD, MSc
To access 4,300 diagnoses written by the world's leading experts in radiology, please log in or subscribe.Subscribe

KEY FACTS

  • Clinical Implications

    • US Findings

      • CEUS Findings

        IMAGING ANATOMY

        • General Anatomic Considerations

          CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

          • Clinical Importance

            IMAGING

            • US Findings

              • CEUS Findings

                Selected References

                1. Wildeboer RR et al: Multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol. 27(8):3226-3234, 2017
                2. Postema AW et al: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound parametric imaging for the detection of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 117(4):598-603, 2016
                3. Turco S et al: Mathematical models of contrast transport kinetics for cancer diagnostic imaging: a review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 9:121-47, 2016
                4. Sano F et al: The utility and limitations of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Sensors (Basel). 15(3):4947-57, 2015
                5. Valerio M et al: Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 68(1):8-19, 2015
                6. Dietrich CF et al: An EFSUMB introduction into dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion. Ultraschall Med. 33(4):344-51, 2012
                7. Kundavaram CR et al: Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 22(4):303-9, 2012
                8. Oon SF et al: Epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer. BJU Int. 108(4):518-25, 2011
                9. Smeenge M et al: Novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer. World J Urol. 29(5):581-7, 2011
                10. Trabulsi EJ et al: Enhanced transrectal ultrasound modalities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urology. 76(5):1025-33, 2010
                11. Tang J et al: Enhancement characteristics of benign and malignant focal peripheral nodules in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland studied using contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 63(10):1086-91, 2008
                12. Wink M et al: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and prostate cancer; a multicentre European research coordination project. Eur Urol. 54(5):982-92, 2008
                13. Linden RA et al: Advances in transrectal ultrasound imaging of the prostate. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 28(4):249-57, 2007
                14. Halpern EJ: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer. Rev Urol. 8 Suppl 1:S29-37, 2006
                Related Anatomy
                Loading...
                Related Differential Diagnoses
                Loading...
                References
                Tables

                Tables

                KEY FACTS

                • Clinical Implications

                  • US Findings

                    • CEUS Findings

                      IMAGING ANATOMY

                      • General Anatomic Considerations

                        CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

                        • Clinical Importance

                          IMAGING

                          • US Findings

                            • CEUS Findings

                              Selected References

                              1. Wildeboer RR et al: Multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol. 27(8):3226-3234, 2017
                              2. Postema AW et al: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound parametric imaging for the detection of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 117(4):598-603, 2016
                              3. Turco S et al: Mathematical models of contrast transport kinetics for cancer diagnostic imaging: a review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 9:121-47, 2016
                              4. Sano F et al: The utility and limitations of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Sensors (Basel). 15(3):4947-57, 2015
                              5. Valerio M et al: Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 68(1):8-19, 2015
                              6. Dietrich CF et al: An EFSUMB introduction into dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion. Ultraschall Med. 33(4):344-51, 2012
                              7. Kundavaram CR et al: Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 22(4):303-9, 2012
                              8. Oon SF et al: Epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer. BJU Int. 108(4):518-25, 2011
                              9. Smeenge M et al: Novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer. World J Urol. 29(5):581-7, 2011
                              10. Trabulsi EJ et al: Enhanced transrectal ultrasound modalities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urology. 76(5):1025-33, 2010
                              11. Tang J et al: Enhancement characteristics of benign and malignant focal peripheral nodules in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland studied using contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 63(10):1086-91, 2008
                              12. Wink M et al: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and prostate cancer; a multicentre European research coordination project. Eur Urol. 54(5):982-92, 2008
                              13. Linden RA et al: Advances in transrectal ultrasound imaging of the prostate. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 28(4):249-57, 2007
                              14. Halpern EJ: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer. Rev Urol. 8 Suppl 1:S29-37, 2006