Katie M. Davis, DO; Wendie A. Berg, MD, PhD, FACR, FSBI
To access 4,300 diagnoses written by the world's leading experts in radiology, please log in or subscribe.Log inSubscribe
0
19
4
0
KEY FACTS
Terminology
Imaging
Top Differential Diagnoses
Clinical Issues
TERMINOLOGY
Synonyms
Cobblestone, beaded, string of pearls, bunch of grapes
Definitions
Focus: Tiny dot of enhancement too small to be space occupying (i.e., not mass); shape and margins cannot be described; ≤ 4 mm
Nonmass enhancement (NME): Neither focus nor mass, not space occupying
Internal enhancement patterns of NME: Clumped, clustered ring
Clumped: Aggregate of foci or small, nodular areas
Clustered ring: Periductal enhancement related to contrast pooling in periductal stroma
Both clumped and clustered ring enhancement are strong indicators of malignancy and often coexist
Consider NME distribution
Focal: < volume of quadrant, fat or fibroglandular tissue interspersed between abnormality
Linear: Arranged in line or line that branches, suggests ductal distribution
Segmental: Cone of enhancement with apex pointing toward nipple
Regional: Large geographic area > 1 quadrant, not conforming to 1 ductal distribution
DCIS: Proliferation of malignant epithelial cells that line terminal ductal-lobular unit without invasion of basement membrane
IMAGING
General Features
Imaging Recommendations
Image-Guided Biopsy
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
PATHOLOGY
General Features
Microscopic Features
CLINICAL ISSUES
Demographics
Natural History & Prognosis
Treatment
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Image Interpretation Pearls
Selected References
Lee SM et al: Patterns of malignant non-mass enhancement on 3-T breast MRI help predict invasiveness: using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition. Acta Radiol. 59(11):1292-9, 2018
Chikarmane SA et al: Revisiting nonmass enhancement in breast MRI: analysis of outcomes and follow-up using the updated BI-RADS atlas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 209(5):1178-84, 2017
Chu AN et al: Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of granulomatous mastitis. Clin Imaging. 43:199-201, 2017
Milosevic ZC et al: Breast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: fibrocystic changes presenting as a non-mass enhancement mimicking malignancy. Radiol Oncol. 51(2):130-6, 2017
Machida Y et al: Descriptors of malignant non-mass enhancement of breast MRI: their correlation to the presence of invasion. Acad Radiol. 23(6):687-95, 2016
Shimauchi A et al: Morphology evaluation of nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: Effect of a three-step interpretation model for readers' performances and biopsy recommendations. Eur J Radiol. 85(2):480-8, 2016
Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology; 2013.
Greenwood HI et al: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: review of MR imaging features. Radiographics. 33(6):1569-88, 2013
Uematsu T et al: High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198(5):1223-30, 2012
Wilhelm A et al: Malignancy rates of non-masslike enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging using American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors. Breast J. 18(6):523-6, 2012
Kim JA et al: MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196(6):1450-6, 2011
Abe H et al: MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 194(2):370-7, 2010
Jones KN et al: Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: imaging findings with pathologic and clinical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 195(4):1036-42, 2010
Mossa-Basha M et al: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics. 30:1673-87, 2010
Yamada T et al: Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics. 30(5):1183-98, 2010
Demartini WB et al: Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 192(4):1128-34, 2009
Meissnitzer M et al: Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 193(4):1025-9, 2009
Raza S et al: Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 191(3):689-99, 2008
Kuhl CK et al: MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 370(9586):485-92, 2007
Macura KJ et al: Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics. 26(6):1719-34; quiz 1719, 2006
Morakkabati-Spitz N et al: Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 15(9):2010-7, 2005
Liberman L et al: Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 181(2):519-25, 2003
Nakahara H et al: A comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer. 10(4):320-9, 2003
Neubauer H et al: High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol. 76(901):3-12, 2003
Tuncbilek N et al: Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance mammography. Breast J. 9(5):403-8, 2003
Liberman L et al: Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 179(1):171-8, 2002
Related Anatomy
Loading...
Related Differential Diagnoses
Loading...
References
Tables
Tables
KEY FACTS
Terminology
Imaging
Top Differential Diagnoses
Clinical Issues
TERMINOLOGY
Synonyms
Cobblestone, beaded, string of pearls, bunch of grapes
Definitions
Focus: Tiny dot of enhancement too small to be space occupying (i.e., not mass); shape and margins cannot be described; ≤ 4 mm
Nonmass enhancement (NME): Neither focus nor mass, not space occupying
Internal enhancement patterns of NME: Clumped, clustered ring
Clumped: Aggregate of foci or small, nodular areas
Clustered ring: Periductal enhancement related to contrast pooling in periductal stroma
Both clumped and clustered ring enhancement are strong indicators of malignancy and often coexist
Consider NME distribution
Focal: < volume of quadrant, fat or fibroglandular tissue interspersed between abnormality
Linear: Arranged in line or line that branches, suggests ductal distribution
Segmental: Cone of enhancement with apex pointing toward nipple
Regional: Large geographic area > 1 quadrant, not conforming to 1 ductal distribution
DCIS: Proliferation of malignant epithelial cells that line terminal ductal-lobular unit without invasion of basement membrane
IMAGING
General Features
Imaging Recommendations
Image-Guided Biopsy
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
PATHOLOGY
General Features
Microscopic Features
CLINICAL ISSUES
Demographics
Natural History & Prognosis
Treatment
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Image Interpretation Pearls
Selected References
Lee SM et al: Patterns of malignant non-mass enhancement on 3-T breast MRI help predict invasiveness: using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition. Acta Radiol. 59(11):1292-9, 2018
Chikarmane SA et al: Revisiting nonmass enhancement in breast MRI: analysis of outcomes and follow-up using the updated BI-RADS atlas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 209(5):1178-84, 2017
Chu AN et al: Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of granulomatous mastitis. Clin Imaging. 43:199-201, 2017
Milosevic ZC et al: Breast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: fibrocystic changes presenting as a non-mass enhancement mimicking malignancy. Radiol Oncol. 51(2):130-6, 2017
Machida Y et al: Descriptors of malignant non-mass enhancement of breast MRI: their correlation to the presence of invasion. Acad Radiol. 23(6):687-95, 2016
Shimauchi A et al: Morphology evaluation of nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: Effect of a three-step interpretation model for readers' performances and biopsy recommendations. Eur J Radiol. 85(2):480-8, 2016
Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology; 2013.
Greenwood HI et al: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: review of MR imaging features. Radiographics. 33(6):1569-88, 2013
Uematsu T et al: High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198(5):1223-30, 2012
Wilhelm A et al: Malignancy rates of non-masslike enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging using American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors. Breast J. 18(6):523-6, 2012
Kim JA et al: MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196(6):1450-6, 2011
Abe H et al: MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 194(2):370-7, 2010
Jones KN et al: Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: imaging findings with pathologic and clinical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 195(4):1036-42, 2010
Mossa-Basha M et al: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics. 30:1673-87, 2010
Yamada T et al: Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics. 30(5):1183-98, 2010
Demartini WB et al: Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 192(4):1128-34, 2009
Meissnitzer M et al: Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 193(4):1025-9, 2009
Raza S et al: Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 191(3):689-99, 2008
Kuhl CK et al: MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 370(9586):485-92, 2007
Macura KJ et al: Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics. 26(6):1719-34; quiz 1719, 2006
Morakkabati-Spitz N et al: Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 15(9):2010-7, 2005
Liberman L et al: Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 181(2):519-25, 2003
Nakahara H et al: A comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer. 10(4):320-9, 2003
Neubauer H et al: High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol. 76(901):3-12, 2003
Tuncbilek N et al: Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance mammography. Breast J. 9(5):403-8, 2003
Liberman L et al: Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 179(1):171-8, 2002
STATdx includes over 200,000 searchable images, including x-ray, CT, MR and ultrasound images. To access all images, please log in or subscribe.