LAA Imaging Pre and Post Occluder Device Placement
Seth Kligerman, MD
To access 4,300 diagnoses written by the world's leading experts in radiology, please log in or subscribe.Log inSubscribe
KEY FACTS
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
IMAGING
IMAGING ANATOMY
General Anatomic Considerations
Critical Anatomic Structures
Anatomic Relationships
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Clinical Importance
Function & Dysfunction
IMAGING
Echocardiography
ECG-Gated Cardiac CTA With Contrast
Imaging Protocols
Imaging Pitfalls
Selected References
Calkins H et al: 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 20(1):e1-e160, 2018
Eng MH et al: Computed tomography for left atrial appendage occlusion case planning. Interv Cardiol Clin. 7(3):367-78, 2018
Korsholm K et al: Cardiac computed tomography for left atrial appendage occlusion: Acquisition, analysis, advantages, and limitations. Interv Cardiol Clin. 7(2):229-42, 2018
Landmesser U et al: Left atrial appendage occlusion with the AMPLATZER Amulet device: one-year follow-up from the prospective global Amulet observational registry. EuroIntervention. 14(5):e590-7, 2018
Morcos R et al: Accuracy of Commonly-Used Imaging Modalities in Assessing Left Atrial Appendage for Interventional Closure: Review Article. J Clin Med. 7(11), 2018
Xu B et al: Computed tomography measurement of the left atrial appendage for optimal sizing of the Watchman device. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 12(1):50-5, 2018
Akin I et al: Left atrial appendage occlusion: A better alternative to anticoagulation? World J Cardiol. 9(2):139-146, 2017
Asmarats L et al: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Devices and Clinical Outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 10(11), 2017
Chow DH et al: A comparative study of different imaging modalities for successful percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. Open Heart. 4(2):e000627, 2017
Ellis CR et al: Angiographic Efficacy of the Atriclip Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion Device Placed by Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Approach. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 3(12):1356-1365, 2017
Goitein O et al: Cardiac CT Angiography (CCTA) predicts left atrial appendage occluder device size and procedure outcome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 33(5):739-747, 2017
Suradi HS et al: Left atrial appendage closure: outcomes and challenges. Neth Heart J. 25(2):143-151, 2017
Wang DD et al: Application of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Image Guidance to WATCHMAN Implantation and Impact on Early Operator Learning Curve: Single-Center Experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 9(22):2329-2340, 2016
Ismail TF et al: CT imaging for left atrial appendage closure: a review and pictorial essay. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 9(2):89-102, 2015
Jaguszewski M et al: Cardiac CT and echocardiographic evaluation of peri-device flow after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the AMPLATZER cardiac plug device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 85(2):306-12, 2015
Wunderlich NC et al: Percutaneous interventions for left atrial appendage exclusion: options, assessment, and imaging using 2D and 3D echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 8(4):472-488, 2015
Beigel R et al: The left atrial appendage: anatomy, function, and noninvasive evaluation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 7(12):1251-65, 2014
Freixa X et al: Left atrial appendage occlusion: initial experience with the Amplatzer™ Amulet™. Int J Cardiol. 174(3):492-6, 2014
Viles-Gonzalez JF et al: The clinical impact of incomplete left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman Device in patients with atrial fibrillation: a PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 59(10):923-9, 2012
Park JW et al: Left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer cardiac plug in atrial fibrillation: initial European experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 77(5):700-6, 2011
Boston Scientific Manual
Related Anatomy
Loading...
Related Differential Diagnoses
Loading...
References
Tables
Tables
KEY FACTS
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
IMAGING
IMAGING ANATOMY
General Anatomic Considerations
Critical Anatomic Structures
Anatomic Relationships
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Clinical Importance
Function & Dysfunction
IMAGING
Echocardiography
ECG-Gated Cardiac CTA With Contrast
Imaging Protocols
Imaging Pitfalls
Selected References
Calkins H et al: 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 20(1):e1-e160, 2018
Eng MH et al: Computed tomography for left atrial appendage occlusion case planning. Interv Cardiol Clin. 7(3):367-78, 2018
Korsholm K et al: Cardiac computed tomography for left atrial appendage occlusion: Acquisition, analysis, advantages, and limitations. Interv Cardiol Clin. 7(2):229-42, 2018
Landmesser U et al: Left atrial appendage occlusion with the AMPLATZER Amulet device: one-year follow-up from the prospective global Amulet observational registry. EuroIntervention. 14(5):e590-7, 2018
Morcos R et al: Accuracy of Commonly-Used Imaging Modalities in Assessing Left Atrial Appendage for Interventional Closure: Review Article. J Clin Med. 7(11), 2018
Xu B et al: Computed tomography measurement of the left atrial appendage for optimal sizing of the Watchman device. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 12(1):50-5, 2018
Akin I et al: Left atrial appendage occlusion: A better alternative to anticoagulation? World J Cardiol. 9(2):139-146, 2017
Asmarats L et al: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Devices and Clinical Outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 10(11), 2017
Chow DH et al: A comparative study of different imaging modalities for successful percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. Open Heart. 4(2):e000627, 2017
Ellis CR et al: Angiographic Efficacy of the Atriclip Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion Device Placed by Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Approach. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 3(12):1356-1365, 2017
Goitein O et al: Cardiac CT Angiography (CCTA) predicts left atrial appendage occluder device size and procedure outcome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 33(5):739-747, 2017
Suradi HS et al: Left atrial appendage closure: outcomes and challenges. Neth Heart J. 25(2):143-151, 2017
Wang DD et al: Application of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Image Guidance to WATCHMAN Implantation and Impact on Early Operator Learning Curve: Single-Center Experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 9(22):2329-2340, 2016
Ismail TF et al: CT imaging for left atrial appendage closure: a review and pictorial essay. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 9(2):89-102, 2015
Jaguszewski M et al: Cardiac CT and echocardiographic evaluation of peri-device flow after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the AMPLATZER cardiac plug device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 85(2):306-12, 2015
Wunderlich NC et al: Percutaneous interventions for left atrial appendage exclusion: options, assessment, and imaging using 2D and 3D echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 8(4):472-488, 2015
Beigel R et al: The left atrial appendage: anatomy, function, and noninvasive evaluation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 7(12):1251-65, 2014
Freixa X et al: Left atrial appendage occlusion: initial experience with the Amplatzer™ Amulet™. Int J Cardiol. 174(3):492-6, 2014
Viles-Gonzalez JF et al: The clinical impact of incomplete left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman Device in patients with atrial fibrillation: a PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 59(10):923-9, 2012
Park JW et al: Left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer cardiac plug in atrial fibrillation: initial European experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 77(5):700-6, 2011
Boston Scientific Manual
STATdx includes over 200,000 searchable images, including x-ray, CT, MR and ultrasound images. To access all images, please log in or subscribe.