link
Bookmarks
Linear Distribution of Calcifications
Wendie A. Berg, MD, PhD, FACR, FSBI
To access 4,300 diagnoses written by the world's leading experts in radiology, please log in or subscribe.Log inSubscribe
0
24
1
0

KEY FACTS

  • Terminology

    • Imaging

      • Pathology

        • Clinical Issues

          TERMINOLOGY

          • Synonyms

            • "Ductal" distribution = subset of "linear" distribution
          • Definitions

            • Calcifications (Ca⁺⁺) arrayed in line, suggesting deposits in duct
            • Most often oriented toward nipple
            • Includes "Y" distribution within duct and minimal branching
            • "Segmental" preferred when Ca⁺⁺ seen in expected course of duct and multiple branches
            • Vascular Ca⁺⁺ in linear distribution in artery wall on both views, usually pathognomonic appearance
            • Distinguish from "curvilinear," which suggests calcification at periphery of round or oval mass, or layering within cysts or microcysts, favoring benign etiology
            • "Fine linear or branching" used to describe individual Ca⁺⁺ morphology, not distribution
            • Linear distribution can also be used to describe multiple masses or nonmass enhancement (NME)

          IMAGING

          • General Features

            • Mammographic Findings

              • Ultrasonographic Findings

                • MR Findings

                  • Nuclear Medicine Findings

                    • Image-Guided Biopsy

                      DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

                        PATHOLOGY

                        • General Features

                          CLINICAL ISSUES

                          • Presentation

                            • Natural History & Prognosis

                              • Treatment

                                DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST

                                • Consider

                                  • Image Interpretation Pearls

                                    Selected References

                                    1. Aminololama-Shakeri S et al: Can radiologists predict the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 208(4):933-939, 2017
                                    2. Kaltenbach B et al: A matrix of morphology and distribution of calcifications in the breast: Analysis of 849 vacuum-assisted biopsies. Eur J Radiol. 86:221-226, 2017
                                    3. Kuhl CK et al: Impact of preoperative breast MR imaging and MR-guided surgery on diagnosis and surgical outcome of women with invasive breast cancer with and without DCIS component. Radiology. 161449, 2017
                                    4. Kim SY et al: Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Ann Surg Oncol. 22(9):2895-901, 2015
                                    5. Sickles EA et al. ACR BI-RADS Mammography. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013
                                    6. Lai KC et al: Linear breast calcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 199(2):W151-7, 2012
                                    7. Narayanan D et al: Interpretation of positron emission mammography: feature analysis and rates of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196(4):956-70, 2011
                                    8. Bent CK et al: The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 194(5):1378-83, 2010
                                    9. Burnside ES et al: Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology. 242(2):388-95, 2007
                                    10. Bazzocchi M et al: Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 186(6):1723-32, 2006
                                    11. Menell JH et al: Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 11(6):382-90, 2005
                                    12. Morakkabati-Spitz N et al: Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 15(9):2010-7, 2005
                                    13. Berg WA: Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin North Am. 42(5):935-46, vii, 2004
                                    14. Liberman L et al: Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 181(2):519-25, 2003
                                    15. Soo MS et al: Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR 180:941-8, 2003
                                    16. Liberman L et al: Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 179(1):171-8, 2002
                                    17. Nunes LW et al: Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology. 219(2):484-94, 2001
                                    18. Bilgen IG et al: Fat necrosis of the breast: clinical, mammographic and sonographic features. Eur J Radiol. 39(2):92-9, 2001
                                    19. Liberman L et al: Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 177(3):565-72, 2001
                                    20. Liberman L et al: The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 171(1):35-40, 1998
                                    21. Gluck BS et al: Microcalcifications on postoperative mammograms as an indicator of adequacy of tumor excision. Radiology. 188(2):469-72, 1993
                                    22. Holland R et al: Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet. 335(8688):519-22, 1990
                                    Related Anatomy
                                    Loading...
                                    Related Differential Diagnoses
                                    Loading...
                                    References
                                    Tables

                                    Tables

                                    KEY FACTS

                                    • Terminology

                                      • Imaging

                                        • Pathology

                                          • Clinical Issues

                                            TERMINOLOGY

                                            • Synonyms

                                              • "Ductal" distribution = subset of "linear" distribution
                                            • Definitions

                                              • Calcifications (Ca⁺⁺) arrayed in line, suggesting deposits in duct
                                              • Most often oriented toward nipple
                                              • Includes "Y" distribution within duct and minimal branching
                                              • "Segmental" preferred when Ca⁺⁺ seen in expected course of duct and multiple branches
                                              • Vascular Ca⁺⁺ in linear distribution in artery wall on both views, usually pathognomonic appearance
                                              • Distinguish from "curvilinear," which suggests calcification at periphery of round or oval mass, or layering within cysts or microcysts, favoring benign etiology
                                              • "Fine linear or branching" used to describe individual Ca⁺⁺ morphology, not distribution
                                              • Linear distribution can also be used to describe multiple masses or nonmass enhancement (NME)

                                            IMAGING

                                            • General Features

                                              • Mammographic Findings

                                                • Ultrasonographic Findings

                                                  • MR Findings

                                                    • Nuclear Medicine Findings

                                                      • Image-Guided Biopsy

                                                        DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

                                                          PATHOLOGY

                                                          • General Features

                                                            CLINICAL ISSUES

                                                            • Presentation

                                                              • Natural History & Prognosis

                                                                • Treatment

                                                                  DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST

                                                                  • Consider

                                                                    • Image Interpretation Pearls

                                                                      Selected References

                                                                      1. Aminololama-Shakeri S et al: Can radiologists predict the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 208(4):933-939, 2017
                                                                      2. Kaltenbach B et al: A matrix of morphology and distribution of calcifications in the breast: Analysis of 849 vacuum-assisted biopsies. Eur J Radiol. 86:221-226, 2017
                                                                      3. Kuhl CK et al: Impact of preoperative breast MR imaging and MR-guided surgery on diagnosis and surgical outcome of women with invasive breast cancer with and without DCIS component. Radiology. 161449, 2017
                                                                      4. Kim SY et al: Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Ann Surg Oncol. 22(9):2895-901, 2015
                                                                      5. Sickles EA et al. ACR BI-RADS Mammography. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013
                                                                      6. Lai KC et al: Linear breast calcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 199(2):W151-7, 2012
                                                                      7. Narayanan D et al: Interpretation of positron emission mammography: feature analysis and rates of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196(4):956-70, 2011
                                                                      8. Bent CK et al: The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 194(5):1378-83, 2010
                                                                      9. Burnside ES et al: Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology. 242(2):388-95, 2007
                                                                      10. Bazzocchi M et al: Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 186(6):1723-32, 2006
                                                                      11. Menell JH et al: Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 11(6):382-90, 2005
                                                                      12. Morakkabati-Spitz N et al: Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 15(9):2010-7, 2005
                                                                      13. Berg WA: Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radiol Clin North Am. 42(5):935-46, vii, 2004
                                                                      14. Liberman L et al: Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 181(2):519-25, 2003
                                                                      15. Soo MS et al: Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR 180:941-8, 2003
                                                                      16. Liberman L et al: Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 179(1):171-8, 2002
                                                                      17. Nunes LW et al: Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology. 219(2):484-94, 2001
                                                                      18. Bilgen IG et al: Fat necrosis of the breast: clinical, mammographic and sonographic features. Eur J Radiol. 39(2):92-9, 2001
                                                                      19. Liberman L et al: Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 177(3):565-72, 2001
                                                                      20. Liberman L et al: The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 171(1):35-40, 1998
                                                                      21. Gluck BS et al: Microcalcifications on postoperative mammograms as an indicator of adequacy of tumor excision. Radiology. 188(2):469-72, 1993
                                                                      22. Holland R et al: Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet. 335(8688):519-22, 1990