link
Bookmarks
Ultrasound
Anatomy
Abdomen
Liver
Liver
Aya Kamaya, MD, FSRU, FSAR
To access 4,300 diagnoses written by the world's leading experts in radiology.Try it free - 15 days

GROSS ANATOMY

  • Overview

    IMAGING ANATOMY

    • Internal Contents

      ANATOMY IMAGING ISSUES

      • Imaging Recommendations

        • Imaging Pitfalls

          CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

          • Clinical Importance

            Selected References

            1. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging et al: ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right upper quadrant pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 16(5S):S235-43, 2019
            2. Revzin MV et al: Optimizing image quality when evaluating blood flow at Doppler US: a tutorial. Radiographics. 39(5):1501-23, 2019
            3. Rodgers SK et al: Role of US LI-RADS in the LI-RADS algorithm. Radiographics. 39(3):690-708, 2019
            4. Tse JR et al: Performance of hepatic artery velocity in evaluation of causes of markedly elevated liver tests. Ultrasound Med Biol. 44(11):2233-40, 2018
            5. Elsayes KM et al: A comprehensive approach to hepatic vascular disease. Radiographics. 37(3):813-36, 2017
            6. Kwo PY et al: ACG clinical guideline: evaluation of abnormal liver chemistries. Am J Gastroenterol. 112(1):18-35, 2017
            7. Heller MT et al: The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of diffuse liver disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 52(6):1163-75, 2014
            8. McArthur TA et al: The common duct dilates after cholecystectomy and with advancing age: reality or myth? J Ultrasound Med. 32(8):1385-91, 2013
            9. McNaughton DA et al: Doppler US of the liver made simple. Radiographics. 31(1):161-88, 2011
            10. Horrow MM: Ultrasound of the extrahepatic bile duct: issues of size. Ultrasound Q. 26(2):67-74, 2010
            11. Kruskal JB et al: Optimizing Doppler and color flow US: application to hepatic sonography. Radiographics. 24(3):657-75, 2004
            Related Anatomy
            Loading...
            Related Differential Diagnoses
            Loading...
            References
            Tables

            Tables

            GROSS ANATOMY

            • Overview

              IMAGING ANATOMY

              • Internal Contents

                ANATOMY IMAGING ISSUES

                • Imaging Recommendations

                  • Imaging Pitfalls

                    CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

                    • Clinical Importance

                      Selected References

                      1. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging et al: ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right upper quadrant pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 16(5S):S235-43, 2019
                      2. Revzin MV et al: Optimizing image quality when evaluating blood flow at Doppler US: a tutorial. Radiographics. 39(5):1501-23, 2019
                      3. Rodgers SK et al: Role of US LI-RADS in the LI-RADS algorithm. Radiographics. 39(3):690-708, 2019
                      4. Tse JR et al: Performance of hepatic artery velocity in evaluation of causes of markedly elevated liver tests. Ultrasound Med Biol. 44(11):2233-40, 2018
                      5. Elsayes KM et al: A comprehensive approach to hepatic vascular disease. Radiographics. 37(3):813-36, 2017
                      6. Kwo PY et al: ACG clinical guideline: evaluation of abnormal liver chemistries. Am J Gastroenterol. 112(1):18-35, 2017
                      7. Heller MT et al: The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of diffuse liver disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 52(6):1163-75, 2014
                      8. McArthur TA et al: The common duct dilates after cholecystectomy and with advancing age: reality or myth? J Ultrasound Med. 32(8):1385-91, 2013
                      9. McNaughton DA et al: Doppler US of the liver made simple. Radiographics. 31(1):161-88, 2011
                      10. Horrow MM: Ultrasound of the extrahepatic bile duct: issues of size. Ultrasound Q. 26(2):67-74, 2010
                      11. Kruskal JB et al: Optimizing Doppler and color flow US: application to hepatic sonography. Radiographics. 24(3):657-75, 2004