Darragh Brady, MD; Gerard M. Healy, MD; Jonathan D. Dodd, MD, MSc, MRCPI, FFR(RCSI)
To access 4,300 diagnoses written by the world's leading experts in radiology, please log in or subscribe.Log inSubscribe
0
0
4
0
KEY FACTS
Terminology
Imaging
Clinical Issues
Diagnostic Checklist
TERMINOLOGY
Abbreviations
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
Definitions
Postoperative atherosclerotic disease of bypass grafts or native coronary arteries
IMAGING
General Features
CT Findings
MR Findings
Echocardiographic Findings
Angiographic Findings
Nuclear Medicine Findings
Imaging Recommendations
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
PATHOLOGY
General Features
CLINICAL ISSUES
Presentation
Natural History & Prognosis
Treatment
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Consider
Selected References
Erthal F et al: Cardiac computed tomography: Before and after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Imaging. 33(3):156-67, 2018
Zhao Q et al: Effect of ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor alone, or aspirin alone on saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 319(16):1677-86, 2018
Patel MR et al: ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 69(17):2212-41, 2017
Salata BM et al: Role of cardiac PET in clinical practice. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 19(12):93, 2017
Chan M et al: A systematic review and meta-analysis of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts. Int J Cardiol. 221:898-905, 2016
Authors/Task Force members. et al: 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 35(37):2541-619, 2014
Mavrogeni S et al: Contribution of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of coronary arteries. World J Cardiol. 6(10):1060-6, 2014
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F et al: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with previous cardiovascular surgery. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 15(3):235-48, 2014
Robertson KE et al: Prevention of coronary in-stent restenosis and vein graft failure: does vascular gene therapy have a role? Pharmacol Ther. 136(1):23-34, 2012
Shukla N et al: Pathophysiology of saphenous vein graft failure: a brief overview of interventions. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 12(2):114-20, 2012
Sun Z et al: Coronary CT angiography: current status and continuing challenges. Br J Radiol. 85(1013):495-510, 2012
Şahinera L et al: Diagnostic accuracy of 16- versus 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts: a comparative study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 15(5):847-53, 2012
Sørensen R et al: Efficacy of post-operative clopidogrel treatment in patients revascularized with coronary artery bypass grafting after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 57(10):1202-9, 2011
Anders K et al: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 57(3):336-44, 2006
Pache G et al: Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J. 27(8):976-80, 2006
Chiurlia E et al: Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 95(9):1094-7, 2005
Frazier AA et al: Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment with multidetector CT in the early and late postoperative settings. Radiographics. 25(4):881-96, 2005
Gasparovic H et al: Three dimensional computed tomographic imaging in planning the surgical approach for redo cardiac surgery after coronary revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 28(2):244-9, 2005
Stauder NI et al: Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 129(3):607-14, 2005
Marano R et al: Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 14(8):1353-62, 2004
Salm LP et al: Blood flow in coronary artery bypass vein grafts: volume versus velocity at cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology. 232(3):915-20, 2004
Willmann JK et al: Coronary artery bypass grafts: ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography--influence of image reconstruction interval on graft visibility. Radiology. 232(2):568-77, 2004
Bunce NH et al: Coronary artery bypass graft patency: assessment with true ast imaging with steady-state precession versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 227(2):440-6, 2003
Langerak SE et al: Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipient coronary arteries. Circulation. 107(11):1502-8, 2003
Bedaux WL et al: Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance determination of flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 40(10):1848-55, 2002
Hoogwerf BJ et al: A summary of the findings from the Post-CABG trial. Minerva Cardioangiol. 50(4):291-9, 2002
Related Anatomy
Loading...
Related Differential Diagnoses
Loading...
References
Tables
Tables
KEY FACTS
Terminology
Imaging
Clinical Issues
Diagnostic Checklist
TERMINOLOGY
Abbreviations
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
Definitions
Postoperative atherosclerotic disease of bypass grafts or native coronary arteries
IMAGING
General Features
CT Findings
MR Findings
Echocardiographic Findings
Angiographic Findings
Nuclear Medicine Findings
Imaging Recommendations
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
PATHOLOGY
General Features
CLINICAL ISSUES
Presentation
Natural History & Prognosis
Treatment
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST
Consider
Selected References
Erthal F et al: Cardiac computed tomography: Before and after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Imaging. 33(3):156-67, 2018
Zhao Q et al: Effect of ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor alone, or aspirin alone on saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 319(16):1677-86, 2018
Patel MR et al: ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 69(17):2212-41, 2017
Salata BM et al: Role of cardiac PET in clinical practice. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 19(12):93, 2017
Chan M et al: A systematic review and meta-analysis of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts. Int J Cardiol. 221:898-905, 2016
Authors/Task Force members. et al: 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 35(37):2541-619, 2014
Mavrogeni S et al: Contribution of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of coronary arteries. World J Cardiol. 6(10):1060-6, 2014
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F et al: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with previous cardiovascular surgery. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 15(3):235-48, 2014
Robertson KE et al: Prevention of coronary in-stent restenosis and vein graft failure: does vascular gene therapy have a role? Pharmacol Ther. 136(1):23-34, 2012
Shukla N et al: Pathophysiology of saphenous vein graft failure: a brief overview of interventions. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 12(2):114-20, 2012
Sun Z et al: Coronary CT angiography: current status and continuing challenges. Br J Radiol. 85(1013):495-510, 2012
Şahinera L et al: Diagnostic accuracy of 16- versus 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts: a comparative study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 15(5):847-53, 2012
Sørensen R et al: Efficacy of post-operative clopidogrel treatment in patients revascularized with coronary artery bypass grafting after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 57(10):1202-9, 2011
Anders K et al: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 57(3):336-44, 2006
Pache G et al: Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J. 27(8):976-80, 2006
Chiurlia E et al: Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 95(9):1094-7, 2005
Frazier AA et al: Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment with multidetector CT in the early and late postoperative settings. Radiographics. 25(4):881-96, 2005
Gasparovic H et al: Three dimensional computed tomographic imaging in planning the surgical approach for redo cardiac surgery after coronary revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 28(2):244-9, 2005
Stauder NI et al: Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 129(3):607-14, 2005
Marano R et al: Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 14(8):1353-62, 2004
Salm LP et al: Blood flow in coronary artery bypass vein grafts: volume versus velocity at cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology. 232(3):915-20, 2004
Willmann JK et al: Coronary artery bypass grafts: ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography--influence of image reconstruction interval on graft visibility. Radiology. 232(2):568-77, 2004
Bunce NH et al: Coronary artery bypass graft patency: assessment with true ast imaging with steady-state precession versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 227(2):440-6, 2003
Langerak SE et al: Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipient coronary arteries. Circulation. 107(11):1502-8, 2003
Bedaux WL et al: Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance determination of flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 40(10):1848-55, 2002
Hoogwerf BJ et al: A summary of the findings from the Post-CABG trial. Minerva Cardioangiol. 50(4):291-9, 2002
STATdx includes over 200,000 searchable images, including x-ray, CT, MR and ultrasound images. To access all images, please log in or subscribe.