link
Bookmarks
Head and Neck
Differential Diagnosis
Orbit
Generic Imaging Patterns
Surgical Devices and Treatment Effects in Orbit
Surgical Devices and Treatment Effects in Orbit
Blair A. Winegar, MD
To access 4,300 diagnoses written by the world's leading experts in radiology.Try it free - 15 days

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

    ESSENTIAL INFORMATION

    • Key Differential Diagnosis Issues

      • Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses

        • Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses

          • Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses

            Selected References

            1. Anderson DM et al: Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of a Baerveldt glaucoma implant. J Glaucoma. 26(6):534-540, 2017
            2. Baskaran P et al: Perfluoro-n-octane mimicking an intraocular foreign body. GMS Ophthalmol Cases. 7:Doc30, 2017
            3. Filippidis AS et al: Intraocular silicone oil migration into the ventricles resembling intraventricular hemorrhage: case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 102:695.e7-695.e10, 2017
            4. Reiter MJ et al: Postoperative imaging of the orbital contents. Radiographics. 35(1):221-34, 2015
            5. Sano I et al: Assessment of filtration bleb and endplate positioning using magnetic resonance imaging in eyes implanted with long-tube glaucoma drainage devices. PLoS One. 10(12):e0144595, 2015
            6. Ginat DT et al: Multimodality imaging of hydrogel scleral buckles. Retina. 32(8):1449-52, 2012
            7. Swanger RS et al: Postsurgical imaging of the globe. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 32(1):57-63, 2011
            8. De Feo F et al: Magnetic resonance imaging in patients implanted with Ex-PRESS stainless steel glaucoma drainage microdevice. Am J Ophthalmol. 147(5):907-11, 911.e1, 2009
            9. Lane JI et al: Retinal detachment: imaging of surgical treatments and complications. Radiographics. 23(4):983-94, 2003
            10. Ainbinder DJ et al: Anophthalmic socket and orbital implants. Role of CT and MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 36(6):1133-47, xi, 1998
            Related Anatomy
            Loading...
            Related Differential Diagnoses
            Loading...
            References
            Tables

            Tables

            DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

              ESSENTIAL INFORMATION

              • Key Differential Diagnosis Issues

                • Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses

                  • Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses

                    • Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses

                      Selected References

                      1. Anderson DM et al: Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of a Baerveldt glaucoma implant. J Glaucoma. 26(6):534-540, 2017
                      2. Baskaran P et al: Perfluoro-n-octane mimicking an intraocular foreign body. GMS Ophthalmol Cases. 7:Doc30, 2017
                      3. Filippidis AS et al: Intraocular silicone oil migration into the ventricles resembling intraventricular hemorrhage: case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 102:695.e7-695.e10, 2017
                      4. Reiter MJ et al: Postoperative imaging of the orbital contents. Radiographics. 35(1):221-34, 2015
                      5. Sano I et al: Assessment of filtration bleb and endplate positioning using magnetic resonance imaging in eyes implanted with long-tube glaucoma drainage devices. PLoS One. 10(12):e0144595, 2015
                      6. Ginat DT et al: Multimodality imaging of hydrogel scleral buckles. Retina. 32(8):1449-52, 2012
                      7. Swanger RS et al: Postsurgical imaging of the globe. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 32(1):57-63, 2011
                      8. De Feo F et al: Magnetic resonance imaging in patients implanted with Ex-PRESS stainless steel glaucoma drainage microdevice. Am J Ophthalmol. 147(5):907-11, 911.e1, 2009
                      9. Lane JI et al: Retinal detachment: imaging of surgical treatments and complications. Radiographics. 23(4):983-94, 2003
                      10. Ainbinder DJ et al: Anophthalmic socket and orbital implants. Role of CT and MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 36(6):1133-47, xi, 1998